PDF Guns Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies Audible Audio Edition Jared Diamond Doug Ordunio Random House Audio Books

By Coleen Talley on Wednesday, May 15, 2019

PDF Guns Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies Audible Audio Edition Jared Diamond Doug Ordunio Random House Audio Books



Download As PDF : Guns Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies Audible Audio Edition Jared Diamond Doug Ordunio Random House Audio Books

Download PDF Guns Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies Audible Audio Edition Jared Diamond Doug Ordunio Random House Audio Books

Pulitzer Prize, General Nonfiction, 1998

Guns, Germs and Steel examines the rise of civilization and the issues its development has raised throughout history.

Having done field work in New Guinea for more than 30 years, Jared Diamond presents the geographical and ecological factors that have shaped the modern world. From the viewpoint of an evolutionary biologist, he highlights the broadest movements both literal and conceptual on every continent since the Ice Age, and examines societal advances such as writing, religion, government, and technology. Diamond also dissects racial theories of global history, and the resulting work-Guns, Germs and Steel-is a major contribution to our understanding the evolution of human societies.


PDF Guns Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies Audible Audio Edition Jared Diamond Doug Ordunio Random House Audio Books


"Where do I begin?
Was he paid by the number of pages he wrote? Goes into way too much detail about things no one cares about.

Also he is simply selecting things in history that conveniently fit his thesis, this is selection bias.
He makes way too many sweeping generalizations and says that is the reason why so and so country is rich today.
He writes that the larger the population a country has (e.g., it will have more Einsteins), the more competition there will be among its people and there will be more innovators among that population and therefore the country will invent more stuff and eventually become richer. If that's the case then why have no significant inventions come out of India or China in the past 100 years when they have 4x the population of the U.S.?

This book has so many flaws in logic I don't even know how it is so highly rated on Amazon. Oh wait.. I get it now."

Product details

  • Audible Audiobook
  • Listening Length 16 hours and 20 minutes
  • Program Type Audiobook
  • Version Unabridged
  • Publisher Random House Audio
  • Audible.com Release Date January 18, 2011
  • Whispersync for Voice Ready
  • Language English, English
  • ASIN B004JLTPTI

Read Guns Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies Audible Audio Edition Jared Diamond Doug Ordunio Random House Audio Books

Tags : Guns, Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies (Audible Audio Edition) Jared Diamond, Doug Ordunio, Random House Audio Books, ,Jared Diamond, Doug Ordunio, Random House Audio,Guns, Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies,Random House Audio,B004JLTPTI

Guns Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies Audible Audio Edition Jared Diamond Doug Ordunio Random House Audio Books Reviews :


Guns Germs and Steel The Fate of Human Societies Audible Audio Edition Jared Diamond Doug Ordunio Random House Audio Books Reviews


  • Two decades ago a UCLA geography professor named Jared Diamond published Guns, Germs, and Steel The Fates of Human Societies. Diamond hypothesized that the arc of human history was dramatically shifted by geographic, environmental, biological, and other factors, resulting in the worldwide dominance of the leading industrial powers during the past 500 years. The book won a 1997 Pulitzer Prize and quickly became a New York Times bestseller.

    Why is economic development so uneven around the world?

    Diamond posed questions fundamental to the experience of the human race. “Why did wealth and power [among nations] become distributed as they now are, rather than in some other way?” “[W]hy did human development proceed at such different rates on different continents?” “[W]hy were Europeans, rather than Africans or Native Americans, the ones to end up with guns, the nastiest germs, and steel?” In his award-winning book, Diamond posited a “unified synthesis”—a unified field theory of history. Drawing from his wide-ranging knowledge of medicine, evolutionary biology, physiology, linguistics, and anthropology as well as geography, he surveyed the history of the past 13,000 years and identified plausible answers to the questions he had posed. In the process, he wrote what I consider to be the single most illuminating book on the history of the human race.

    Academic critics howled

    However, academic critics howled shortly after the publication of Guns, Germs, and Steel

    They referred to supposed errors in geography and history, which I find largely pointless. For example, geographers complained that Diamond referred to Eurasia as a single continent rather than separately to Asia, North Africa, and Europe. That’s nitpicking, as far as I’m concerned. And many of these “errors” could simply be differences of opinion. Academics are unbearably dogmatic and dismissive of those who reject their pet theories.

    Some accused him of racism, although he rejected racist explanations early, forcefully, and often. That criticism is not only unsupported by Diamond’s book, it’s insulting to the reader.

    The most common and far-reaching complaint was that Diamond had succumbed to the heresy of “environmental determinism.” Understandably, Diamond grounded his argument in geographic and environmental factors—but he repeatedly cited numerous other influences as well. Ultimately, of course, everything we humans do, and everything we’ve done in the millions of years since our ancestors first climbed out of the trees, has been environmentally determined.

    There were complaints that Diamond had overlooked the contrast between temperate and tropical zones (he didn’t) and that he had only explained what happened 500 years ago but not subsequently (untrue). It might appear that at least some of Diamond’s critics never read the book.

    However, the most aggravating criticism was that he had ignored the motives that led the industrial nations to undertake colonialism and imperialism on a broad scale. Diamond addressed only the means that enabled the colonial powers to dominate, not the reasons why they chose to do so. To my mind, that’s no error. He didn’t pretend to explain colonialism and imperialism, merely to describe how it had become possible.

    Is it possible that most of these academic critics were simply bitter that Diamond hadn’t cited their own specialized research?

    The roots of academic criticism

    Though the critics undoubtedly uncovered a misplaced fact or unwarranted conclusion here and there through the book, the errors were exceedingly minor in the context of Diamond’s expansive hypothesis. It should be clear to any dispassionate reader that the academic reaction stemmed, above all, from narrow-mindedness and jealousy. The world of academia today is atomized. Specialties, sub-specialties, and sub-sub-specialties abound. It’s not unusual for a scholar to build a career on the study of a single obscure question that, when answered, will be of interest to virtually nobody. Interdisciplinary studies are frowned upon in most academic circles. Generalists are regarded as “not serious.” And scholars who write popular books, must less bestsellers, can expect a chilly reception from their peers.

    A wealth of meaning behind the title

    To understand where the academic critics went wrong, it’s useful to look at what Diamond signified by his title, Guns, Germs, and Steel. Early in his book, he dwells on the confrontation between the Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro and the Inca god-king Atahuallpa. “The immediate reasons for Pizarro’s success included military technology based on guns, steel weapons [such as swords and daggers], and horses; infectious diseases endemic in Eurasia; European maritime technology; the centralized political organization of European states; and writing. The title of this book will serve as shorthand for those proximate factors.”

    Diamond’s argument in a nutshell

    In a Prologue, Diamond poses the question at the heart of this book. He quotes a friend in what is now Papua New Guinea from a conversation in 1972, when he was studying bird evolution there “‘Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo [goods] and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?'” To answer the question, Diamond begins his story around the year 11,000 BCE, when the last Ice Age was drawing to a close and human beings were beginning to form villages in a few places around the world. It’s unclear whether the formation of villages preceded the deliberate cultivation and production of food, or vice versa. However, regardless of the sequence, that shift from hunter-gatherer society to agriculturally based settlements set in motion the course of events that have led to the “civilization” in which we live.

    Diamond argues, convincingly, that the much greater availability of domesticable plants and large animals in Eurasia than in sub-Saharan Africa and the Americas. Furthermore, he explains that the east-west orientation of Eurasia from the Bering Strait to the Atlantic Ocean made it possible for the development of agriculture and animal husbandry to spread quickly to distant lands. By contrast, the north-south orientation of the Americas and sub-Saharan Africa—and the presence of barriers such as the Sahara Desert, the Panamanian Isthmus, and the deserts of northern Mexico and southwestern United States—impeded the spread of these (and, later, other) new technologies to the extremities of those continents. The advent of food production enabled the development of ever-larger settlements. This, in turn, spelled the emergence of labor specialization and eventually the growth of empires as well as the appearance and spread of communicable diseases contracted from domesticated animals. Those differences in historical development eventually led to the “guns, germs, and steel” that made Eurasian dominance possible—and dictated the huge differences in economic development between what today we call East and West.

    Guns, Germs, and Steel is crammed with facts and densely written. It doesn’t make for light reading. But if you have any interest in understanding how the world came to be as it is, you’ll find this book highly rewarding.
  • Where do I begin?
    Was he paid by the number of pages he wrote? Goes into way too much detail about things no one cares about.

    Also he is simply selecting things in history that conveniently fit his thesis, this is selection bias.
    He makes way too many sweeping generalizations and says that is the reason why so and so country is rich today.
    He writes that the larger the population a country has (e.g., it will have more Einsteins), the more competition there will be among its people and there will be more innovators among that population and therefore the country will invent more stuff and eventually become richer. If that's the case then why have no significant inventions come out of India or China in the past 100 years when they have 4x the population of the U.S.?

    This book has so many flaws in logic I don't even know how it is so highly rated on . Oh wait.. I get it now.
  • Here is an author with an inquisitive mind. He searches, not how human races are different, but how they got there. What are the mechanisms that drove their various civilizations in such different trajectories? There exist only a limited number of plants and mammals that lend themselves to domestication and their availability determines the chances of hunter-gatherers to turn into a settled society and to progress in further advancement. In ancient times, if those essential domesticates were not present on your continent, you were indeed a have-not. In these pages you travel around the world and witness, how such factors have favored some sections of humanity more than others.
    This book is a wellspring of information about where we come from and the author distributes it out of a basket of abundant knowledge. You witness the changing face of humanity, usually under the passionate hand of brutality, from Khoisans to Bantus in Africa, from Negritos to Austro-Asians and Austronesians in the Far East, from the Ainus to Japanese, and then of course in that collision of the white man with the Redskins. The incredible judgment dispensed by Francisco Pizarro upon the Incas, supposedly in honor of the Church and the Holy Roman Emperor, will make you shake your head for a long time.
    In contrast to such scholarly research, it is hard to stomach the tasteless comments in some of the one-star reviews of this book. They remind you of what the Bible says about pearls and where you are not to cast them.
  • I first saw a documentary that is based on this book. Because of the documentary, I bought this book. The best part of this book is that it is loaded with details and facts to support the author's message; no human race is inferior to another. Oddly, my least favorite part is also that the book is loaded with details. At times my reading would get bogged down or I would get a bit lost because I was overwhelmed with all the facts. But I put on my big girl pants and keep reading. Most importantly, I learned a lot about how humans came to be industrialized on one geographical location and not so much in another.